E Mail  .  Home 

   
 

 

Introduction & Basic Principle

As an MFL tool navigates the pipeline a magnetic circuit is created between the pipewall and the tool. Brushes typically act as a transmitter of magnetic flux from the tool into the pipewall, and as the magnets are oriented in opposing directions, a flow of flux is created in an elliptical pattern. High Field MFL tools saturate the pipewall with magnetic flux until the pipewall can no longer hold any more flux. The remaining flux leaks out of the pipewall and strategically placed tri-axial Hall effect sensor heads can accurately measure the three dimensional vector of the leakage field.


Given the fact that magnetic flux leakage is a vector quantity and that a hall sensor can only measure in one direction, three sensors must be oriented within a sensor head to accurately measure the axial, radial and circumferential components of an MFL signal. The axial component of the vector signal is measured by a sensor mounted orthogonal to the axis of the pipe, and the radial sensor is mounted to measure the strength of the flux that leaks out of the pipe. The circumferential component of the vector signal can be measured by mounting a sensor perpendicular to this field. Earlier MFL tools recorded only the axial component but high-resolution tools typically measure all three components. To determine if metal loss is occurring on the internal or external surface of a pipe, a separate eddy current sensor is utilized to indicate wall surface location of the anomaly. The unit of measure when sensing an MFL signal is the gauss or the tesla and generally speaking, the larger the change in the detected magnetic field, the larger the anomaly.

Application

The primary purpose of an MFL tool is to detect corrosion in a pipeline. To more accurately predict the dimensions (length, width and depth) of a corrosion feature, extensive testing is performed before the tool enters an operational pipeline. Using a known collection of measured defects, tools can be trained and tested to accurately interpret MFL signals. MFL technique can also used to perform corrosion scanning in tank bottom floors.

Primary Advantages

Fast scanning and after the testing, the collected data is downloaded and compiled so that an analyst is able to accurately interpret the collected signals. High-resolution MFL tools collect data approximately every 2 mm along the axis of a pipe and this superior resolution allows for a comprehensive analysis of collected signals.

Primary Disadvantages

In general not accurate to measure exact depth and size of the corrosion. IRIS may require as back up method for more accuracy in tubular inspection and conventional ultrasonic testing may require as back up method for more accuracy n tank floor examination. Before the examination, material must be cleaned to bare metal.

 

 
 
 

ECT
IRIS
MFL
RFEC
TIR
TOFD

PAUT
CORROSION MAPPING

 
 
 


Home  | Company Overview  |  Our Services  |  Current Projects    Our Branches  |  Career  Contact us